Thank you Pete. I see what you're doing, and appreciate the value of displaying a trend graph.

I would argue that such a graph be clearly identified as not portraying true scaled values, but rather a proprietary average trend function (Objects In The Rear View Mirror May Appear Closer Than They Are).

A casual, but nevertheless critical observer (e.g., your ISP) has no way of knowing that the maximum Y scale with a value of say, 120 ms in a submitted graph, refers to some processed/averaged proprietary value, and not to the peak latency of the time frame being displayed - which might be actually be 1020 ms.

In analogous scientific and financial charting software, the option to display similar propietary scales is also present, but never utilized without being routinely, fully and unambiguously identified as such. The Y scale value should never be a mystery, or a surprise, no matter how clever, or well intentioned it's design. How can you trust a graph as serious data documentation if you have to guess what the Y scale is?

From a purely utilitarian perspective, there are times when I'd like to look at a 12 hour stretch of graph and immediately see only the peak values and have an accurate scale so I can assess all their relative, true values - even if most plot points are lost in the noise below. Again, this is commonplace scientific and financial graphics functionality.

I suspect the above sounds a little severe - so let me say also that your software is easily the very best of its kind - thanks for all your hard work!

Bob